The purpose of this blog is to be a collection site for links to various articles on selected subjects.

Tuesday, August 25, 2015

Women In Combat?!?!?


Men have historically been the front line battle troops.  While many nations in the past have been forced to include women in fighting units for survival, and other countries who are based on an atheistic worldview have put women in combat units because they see no intrinsic difference between the sexes, the majority of civilized nations protect their women — and should especially do so for women in their child-bearing years!   I have to wonder at a culture who would place women in combat at the expense of social engineering.  I believe it is a barbaric mindset, especially when you think about how enemy soldiers treat women to not just torture and death, but also gang rapes!  Who in their right minds would subject a woman to that possibility?!?


And think about the acceptance of women in combat leading to drafting your daughters right out of high school — is that a thing a civilized nation should be doing?

Now this is not to say that some women aren’t capable of doing the job, it just isn’t a job they should be doing if they CAN do it.  Usually, physical requirements are reduced for women so that they can qualify for particular assignments (I saw this first hand in 1974 when women were allowed to take paratroop training but had reduced physical requirements because most couldn’t qualify otherwise) or they reduce the physical requirements for all — including men — so it doesn’t look like they are have higher standards for men!


Think about also the lack of privacy for hygienic duties, changing clothes, living together — all which lead to sexual situations, as well as desensitizing both sexes to modesty and human sexuality in general.  Is this what you want for your daughters?

And what about men who are married and whose wives have to think about them with such intimate living conditions!  Or husbands whose wives have gone to combat living with other men?  Why put such intimate temptations just to satisfy feminists and social engineers?

The following links provide various commentaries and data to support keeping women out of combat.

Examples of reduced physical requirements which could cause harm

Lower physical standards?


Leading advocate calls for lowering standards


“Gender-neutral physical fitness qualifications?


Marines may be forced to lower standards


Mixed gender units have very reduced performance


All male combat units perform better


Filling Ranger school slots with women who won’t make the grade while no women passed Marine endurance test


Higher troop injuries with women


Injuries with women twice that for men


Special allowances for women to pass Ranger training, etc


Women in Combat - Felony Stupid


Opening combat for women is not a result of studies, but of social engineering


Women in combat a bad idea


Women still don’t belong in Combat


The Reality That Awaits Women in Combat

Reasons women should not serve in combat

Sisters in Arms?


Sexual problems arising from men and women living together


Astronomical increase in sexual assaults and harassment have taken place


Why allow them in combat when we don't allow them in men's sports?


The undoing of civilization


A view from a Marine Sergeant Major


Politicians are ruining the Marines

Breast-feeding "soldiers" -- what happens when they are deployed?

Military leaders want women to register for the draft

Do NOT let our daughters die for us

Drafting women is a culture's death wish

Don't use Israel as an example

They NOW have to register for the draft

The draft is WRONG for women

Male and female still matter in combat

Physical fitness tests prove women aren't capable of combat needs

Biological differences being ignored so as to allow "transgender" also.

Female veteran against the draft for women

Women in combat endangers national security

Women are just not suitable for combat!

Consistent high rates of non-deployability in the Navy, due to pregnancy from shipboard service

No comments: